Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Amuse Bouche

 Part II – Tuesday Evening

First of all, there are 2 play-in games tonight. Right now, at the half, Florida-Gulf Coast is pummeling Fairleigh-Dickinson in a 16 vs. 16 game with little import but the right to lose to North Carolina by 40.

But the 2nd game is a doozy, Vanderbilt vs. Wichita St.; two 11 seeds that each have potential to wreak havoc in later rounds. Wichita State guards Fred Van Vleet and Ron Baker have already been to the Final Four as freshman, and were key players on the undefeated regular season team 2 years ago. Such seasoned and successful leadership from the backcourt is usually a recipe for tournament success, and is basically unheard of in an eleven seed. According to efficiency guru Ken Pomeroy, the Shockers have the most efficient defense in the country, also usually a harbinger of deep bracket runs. But if Wichita St. has a weakness, it's a lack of size inside. And Vanderbilt has three 7-footers. Plus Vandy shoots the 3 as well as anybody I've seen this year. Both these teams lost a bunch of games they shouldn't have, especially early in the season, but in Wichita State's defense, their worst stretch was when Fred Van Vleet was out with an injury.

My prediction, Vandy's Wade Baldwin is the best player on the court tonight, but Fred and Ron and Evan Wessel and Anton Grady extend their senior season at least one more game. Shockers, 69-58.

For He Heard the Loud Bassoon

      Yet again, the bracket Brigadoon emerges from the mists, full of questionable insights and faulty prognostications. Like the poster says, “It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others.” So call me the Ancient Bracketeer, and by hearing my pretzel logic and tales of tournaments passed, you will know the error of my ways, and perhaps be empowered to avoid the shoals of my despair.

Part I – Tuesday morning, 3/15/16
  
     Forty hours have passed since Selection Sunday, and by now, typically, I'd be surrounded by printouts of rebounding margins and Pomeroy rankings, feverishly arguing for both sides of 7 vs. 10 matchup such as Iowa vs. Temple, which Fran is the Franniest? Or weighing 11 different Final Four teams by backup point guards' assist-to-turnover ratio in away games.

      Unlike the Ancient Mariner, I have some self-awareness, so I know that way lies madness. Beyond the math, which approaches Avogadrian complexity, the fact that, in filling out a bracket, you are trying to predict the behavior and mind-sets of 64 (play-in games not included) groups of 18 to 22-year-old men, should give your confidence pause.

      In fact, it is that air of misplaced confidence, so common among the professional prognoscenti, that has led me to a new epiphany. No one knows anything. After hearing all winter how chaotic this season has been, about how top teams have more losses than ever and anyone can beat anyone on a neutral court, it drives me crazy that all the experts are picking nothing but 1 and 2 seeds for the Final Four, and everyone has Kansas, UNC or Michigan St. as their National Champion. Look, it's March and Donald Trump continues to lead the race for the Republican nomination. Not for Mendacious Wind-Bag. For President. These may not be End Times, but they sure are crazy ones. So my motto is: Embrace the Chaos. With some caveats, as follows:

  1. Conferences matter, to a point. Last year, the Big 12 underperformed, although they look strong this year. The Big 10 has a long history of disappointing results, Michigan St. excepted. This year, the RPI loves the Pac 12, but when's the last time a Pac 12 team other than Arizona made the Elite Eight? 2008 (UCLA). My plan this year is to give Big 12 and ACC teams the benefit of the doubt, but be skeptical of non-Michigan St. Big 10 teams, and downright disdainful of Pac-12 teams, with the possible exception of Arizona. And I have an irrational love for the 3 Atlantic 10 teams (St. Joe's, Dayton, VCU) that may come back to haunt me.

  2. Coaches matter, to a point. Mike Krzyewski, Roy Williams, John Calipari, Tom Izzo, Bill Self, all these guys are in the Hall of Fame or will be for a reason. They been through March Madness many times and have had great success many times. But they also failed many times, with highly seeded and well-regarded teams losing early. I'll probably pick against a couple of them early, and then hate myself later. What about a younger coach who's ready for a breakthrough to greatness this year. Who will it be? Tony Bennett (please!), Mark Turgeon, Cuonzo Martin, Jay Wright, Matt Painter, Chris Mack, Scott Drew? Can Jim Larranaga bring his Cinderella magic to Miami? And can Shaka Smart exorcise years of bad underperforming juju from Texas? 
     
  3. Player experience matters. This tends to take care of itself for the higher seeds, but there are exceptions. According to this helpful Redditor, who compiled tournament minutes of experience for current players on all 68 teams, some teams have surprisingly low previous experience, such as Oregon, Cal, Texas A&M, and Seton Hall, while others with lower seeds have a lot of experience, for example Arizona, Notre Dame, Wisconsin, and Dayton. And tonight, there's a fascinating test case for the theory that player experience matters when Wichita St., with 832 minutes of player experience (3rd most in the entire field) plays Vanderbilt, with 0 minutes of experience.

But, mostly, I want to have fun. So when in doubt, I'll pick the upset. And my Final Four won't be just 1 and 2 seeds, because where's the fun in that. And as a hedge, I won't pick Virginia or Kentucky to make the Final Four. That way, if they do, I'll be so happy I won't really care if my bracket is toasted garbage. And if they don't, maybe a semi-successful bracket will console me in my time of darkness. Like Coleridge wrote, “The guests are met, the feast is set: May'st hear the merry din.”

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Analysis Makes an Anus out of You and Me

Forty-Eight games into the Madness; plenty of time and data to reveal the strengths and weaknesses of my bracket prediction humors/modes and various blends.  Let's take a look:

Love Bracket - 1st Round - 21/32 correct, 2nd round - 9/16 correct, 39 total points
                      5/8 Elite 8, 2/4 Final Four remaining
Hate Bracket - 1st Round - 22/32 correct, 2nd round - 8/16 correct, 38 total points
                      4/8 Elite 8, 3/4 Final Four remaining, champion gone
Brain Bracket - 1st round - 24/32 correct, 2nd round - 10/16 correct, 44 total points
                      5/8 Elite 8, 4/4 Final Four remaining
Monkey Poo -    1st round - 24/32 correct, 2nd round - 10/16 correct, 44 total points
                      4/8 Elite 8, 3/4 Final Four remaining

I don't know what it means that the Brain and Monkey Poo brackets are my 2 best; it could be that my heart and spleen are both vestigial organs at this point and have little influence on my my prognostication.  It could also just mean I have my head up my ass.

How about the custom blends?

Love/Hate - 1st round - 22/32 correct, 2nd round - 9/16 correct, 40 total points
                   6/8 Elite 8, 4/4 Final Four remaining
Analysis/Hate - 1st round 19/32 correct, 2nd round - 8/16 correct, 35 total points
                   6/8 Elite 8, 4/4 Final Four remaining
Love/Analysis - 1st round - 24/32 correct, 2nd round - 8/16 correct, 40 total points
                   4/8 Elite 8, 2/4 Final Four remaining
Hate/Monkey Poo - 1st round - 23/32 correct, 2nd round 5/16 correct, 33 total points
                   3/8 Elite 8, 1/4 Final Four remaining, champion gone
"Perfection" - 1st round - 20/32 correct, 2nd round - 9/16 correct, 38 total points
                   4/8 Elite 8, 3/4 Final Four remaining, champion gone

Obviously, there are still a lot of games to be played and majority of points still to be scored.  But I have to say my blending process appears to be a failure, since none of the blends is clearly superior to either pure intelligence or pure luck.  Just as an exercise, I decided to see what my best possible blend could have been.  With the right blend, I could have gone 32/32 in the first round and 15/16 in the second round.  Interestingly, the one Sweet 16 team I didn't pick on any of my brackets was my Kentucky Wildcats.  And in most of the cases where only 1 of my 4 humor brackets was correct, it was hate (6/10).  So if there is a lesson to be learned here, it's that picking a few teams I hate could really help my predictions.  The problem is I hate so many teams it's hard to know which ones to pick.

Friday, March 21, 2014

I Feel Lucky

Day 1 was everything I could have hoped for.  Lots of great games, 4 overtimes, 3 upsets accurately predicted, one of my Cinderellas (North Dakota St.) surviving, 2 highly favored teams (Florida and Louisville) looking a little shaky.  If only New Mexico St. could have pulled off the upset in the late game, then I would be ecstatic.

How are my brackets doing, you ask? Let's take a look:

Foundational

Love: 11/16 correct, 2 Sweet 16 teams lost
Hate: 10/16 correct, 2 Sweet 16 teams lost
Analysis: 12/16 correct, no Sweet 16 teams lost
Monkey Poo: 13/16 correct, 2 Sweet 16 teams and 1 Elite 8 team lost

Blends

Love/Analysis: 13/16 correct, no Sweet 16 teams lost
Analysis/Hate: 11/13 correct, 2 Sweet 16 teams and 1 Elite 8 team lost
Love/Hate: 12/16 correct, no Sweet 16 team lost
Hate/Monkey Poo: 12/16 correct, 2 Sweet 16 teams lost

Perfection: 10/16 correct, 1 Sweet 16 team lost

Clearly, by taking the pressure of a perfect bracket off of me and placing on Reality, Reality decided to assert itself and prevent some otherwise wonderful upsets from occurring. Like Huxley said, "...many a beautiful theory was killed by an ugly fact." Ugly fact, thy name is Syracuse.

How about today's games. Let's start with early batch:

(3) Duke vs. (14) Mercer

I have trouble imagining Duke struggling with this game, but if Mercer can pull off the upset, I will proclaim Verdukianism and drink nothing but root beer for the rest of my life.

(6) Baylor vs. (11) Nebraska

Baylor, as always, is capable of higher highs and lower lows than any team not named Tennessee.  Nebraska has to get past the "just happy to be here" problem. I don't think they do, and Baylor's superior talent wins out.

(7) New Mexico vs. (10) Stanford

I can't decide if Mountain West March Sadness Syndrome is stronger than General Pac-12 Mediocrity Malady.  I guess we'll find out.  Really could use a New Mexico win for my best surviving bracket.

(1) Arizona vs. (16) Weber St.

I will cheerfully withdraw my Foofraw Voodoo Curse if Weber St. can pull this one off.  Root Beers for Everyone!


Thursday, March 20, 2014

Dayton Flyers, Baby!

Our first game of the day ends in an upset, and one I actually predicted.  This is the high point and I will revel in it, for now.  And, as I predicted, Wisconsin has dismantled American and Pitt is destroying Colorado, so I could start off 3 for 3.  But Harvard is up 5 early over Cincinnati, so the syncrasticity between my perfect bracket and perfection in this universe may be transitory. Sic transit gloria bracket.

How about the next set of games?

(3) Syracuse vs. (14) Western Michigan

I've got Western Michigan here, but this has more to do with how Syracuse looked the last couple of weeks and my excessive propensity for upsets than any knowledge I have about the Broncos.  I'm hoping for some early coach-hating behavior from the Orange.

(7) Oregon vs. (10) BYU

After the Foofraw Fiasco a few years ago, I swore never again to pick a team from the Beehive State to win a game in the tournament.  Given my abiding dislike of BYU, this is easy.  Go Ducks!

(1) Florida vs. (16) Albany

No matter how much this is an upset devoutly to be wished. I can't see it happening.  If Albany wins, I will renounce root beer.

(4) Michigan St. vs. (13) Delaware

The Spartans are everybody's trendy Final Four pick, as well as many's national champ (I'm looking at you, Barack). This disrepects my Cavaliers and I will not have it.  So even though I know better than to pick against Tom Izzo in March, I'm all in. Go Blue Hens! 

Still Perfect

So, the Wisconsin-American game is headed to halftime, and after a nice start by the Eagles, the Badgers have been asserting themselves and seem to be starting to pull away. Meanwhile, Dayton is justifying my upset faith in them, just now going up 5 early in the second half.  As expected, the Buckeyes' offense is sputtering like Sylvester the cat after a dentist appointment.  And the Flyers are playing with poise and purpose (try saying that in Sylvester's voice).  The end of this could be a lot of fun.

Time's Winged Brackbuster

In 30 minutes, March Madness will begin, and the ticking clock on my anguished futility will start its relentless countdown.  I have tried to forestall it with 9 different brackets and an appeal to multiverse theory, but the fact remains, by the end of today, I will already have overpredicted 3 or 4 upsets and missed the 1 or 2 that actually happened. By Sunday evening no doubt, there will be gaps in my Elite 8 and Final Four.  Let's hope, in fact, that they are gaps and not yawning abysses. 

In the meantime, I hope to enjoy the journey.  In terms of my "perfect" bracket, I've got 4 upsets today: Dayton over Ohio St., Western Michigan over Syracuse, Delaware over Michigan St., and Manhattan over Louisville.  If any one of those happens, I will be a happy camper.

The first 4 games:

(6) Ohio St. vs. (11) Dayton

 Why can Dayton win this game? I have 2 complementary theories. One - the Big 10 wasn't as great as everyone thinks, while the A10 was better than expected. By my calculations, Dayton is a pretty strong 11 seed. And Ohio State may struggle to score 60 points today, since their offense is, let's just say, inconsistent.  Go Flyers!

(2) Wisconsin vs. (15) American

In none of my nine brackets did I even consider this upset.  Ruh-Roh.  As a coach, Bo Ryan does have a history of underperforming in March, but this would be an epic upset.  While I would love the higgledy-piggledy this could cause, I really can't see it happening.

(8) Colorado vs. (9) Pitt

Still don't see how Colorado is an 8 seed, and can't see anything but a classic Pitt defensive beatdown here -  say 67-45.  That may be my ACC bias coming through, due to my unconditional love of this year's Virginia Cavaliers.  But if Colorado wins this game, I will renounce Verdukianism and never celebrate Merlinpeen again.  I will, however, continue to believe in the healing power of root beer.

(5) Cincinnati vs. (12) Harvard

I know, trendy upset pick here.  But I don't think Harvard has seen a team as tough and defensively-minded as Cincinnati.  Plus I think Sean Kilpatrick abuses the Crimson and goes for 30.  Cincinnati wins, 71-51.

See you at halftime.